National Lead Network

Specialty Services Glossary of Terms

Understanding the terminology used across specialty service industries is essential for both providers and clients navigating licensing, contracts, liability, and lead generation. This page defines core terms used throughout the specialty services sector in the United States, covering the vocabulary that appears in contracts, regulatory filings, and professional standards. Precise use of these terms reduces disputes, clarifies scope-of-work expectations, and supports compliance with state-level requirements.


Definition and scope

Specialty service refers to any professional or trade service that requires domain-specific training, certification, or licensing beyond general contractor classifications. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook) distinguishes specialty trade contractors as a formal category within the construction and services industries, a definition that extends into regulatory frameworks used by state licensing boards.

The scope of this glossary covers terminology relevant to residential and commercial specialty services, including lead generation, provider vetting, insurance, contract structure, and consumer protection. Terms are drawn from the frameworks used by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies (NASCLA), and standard commercial contract law.

Key glossary terms:


How it works

Glossaries of this type function as normative reference layers within a larger information ecosystem. When a client encounters a term in a contract — such as "indemnification clause," "force majeure," or "certificate of occupancy" — the glossary provides the plain-language definition alongside its legal or regulatory context.

Indemnification clause: A contractual provision in which one party agrees to cover losses or liabilities incurred by the other. Specialty service contracts commonly include mutual or one-sided indemnification language. The American Institute of Architects (AIA), whose contract documents are widely used across service industries, distinguishes between broad-form, intermediate-form, and limited-form indemnification — three structurally different allocations of risk.

Force majeure: A clause excusing performance when extraordinary events prevent completion. Courts apply a narrow interpretation; routine supply chain delays generally do not qualify.

Certificate of occupancy (CO): A local government document confirming that a completed structure or renovation meets building code. Specialty service providers in construction-adjacent trades must often deliver a CO or facilitate its issuance as a project milestone.


Common scenarios

The following 5 scenarios illustrate how glossary terms apply in real transactions:

  1. Licensing dispute: A client discovers after project completion that the provider held a general contractor license but not the required specialty electrical license. The distinction between license types — general vs. specialty trade — becomes central to any dispute or insurance claim.
  2. Bond claim: A roofing contractor abandons a project. The homeowner files a claim against the contractor's surety bond, invoking the bonding definition and its claim procedures.
  3. Lead qualification: A directory platform screens incoming providers using background check data. The term "qualified lead" means the provider has passed vetting thresholds, not merely submitted contact information. Refer to Specialty Services Background Check Requirements for criteria.
  4. Contract scope dispute: A client argues the SOW included gutter replacement; the provider's SOW listed only roof repair. The written SOW controls.
  5. Consumer complaint: A client files a complaint with a state contractor licensing board, citing misrepresentation. State consumer protection statutes — not just contract law — govern the remedy. The complaint process is outlined at Specialty Services Complaints and Dispute Resolution.

Decision boundaries

Two distinctions appear consistently at decision points in specialty service transactions:

Licensed vs. registered: In 34 states, specialty trade contractors must hold an active license issued by a state board (NASCLA). Registration, by contrast, is an administrative record-keeping requirement that does not authorize work performance. Accepting a registered-only provider as "licensed" is a common contracting error.

Bonded vs. insured: Bonding protects the client against non-performance; insurance protects against accidental damage or injury. A provider carrying only one of these instruments leaves a gap in risk coverage. Specialty service contracts should specify minimum thresholds for both. Additional analysis of liability structures appears at Specialty Services Insurance and Liability.

Understanding these boundaries prevents mismatched expectations, reduces claim frequency, and supports the informed engagement of specialty service providers across residential and commercial contexts.


References

On this site

In the network